Search

International Relations

Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory

January 13, 2017

Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory: Negotiating ‘divides’ in international relations theory

Abstract

The history of the discipline of International Relations is usually narrated as a succession of theories that would pursue different ontologies and epistemologies and focus on different problems. This narrative provides some structure to a multifaceted field and its diverse discussions. However, it is also highly problematic as it ignores common problems, intersections and mutual inspirations and overemphasizes divides over eventual commonalities. Rather than such overemphasis, we suggest instead negotiating between ‘IR theories’ and elaborating their shared foci and philosophies of science in order to provide new perspectives on and approaches to international politics. We here negotiate between the two theoretical movements of classical realism and critical theories that are typically treated as opposites, yet which nonetheless are characterized by shared concerns about political and social crises, modernity and humanity.

Read more here.

Related Topics

Classical Realism

In Tim Dunne, et.al, eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 6th edition (Oxford University Press, 2024).

June 25, 2024
How Not to Counter the Radical Right

‍National Conservatism conferences, one of the main meeting grounds for the global radical right, rarely attract much attention...

April 16, 2024
Historical Realism

In Mlada Bukovansky, et.al, eds., Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations (Oxford University Press, 2023)

August 1, 2023