A new approach is needed to blunt the appeal of far-right movements

These influences are far deeper and much more troubling than commonly observed. They go beyond foreign donations on GoFundMe, endorsements by right-wing personalities, or viral posts on extreme social media platforms. While less immediately visible, the most important international connections are the ideological and political ideas that led to the rise of right-wing movements from Hungary and France to the United States and Brazil. For this reason, the protests may be more important for the longer-term forces they unleash than their immediate impact.

Three ideological strategies characterize recently ascendent right-wing movements, and elements of each are evident in the truckers’ protests. First, they are anti-globalist and anti-elitist. They claim to speak for the “real people, in real places”, those forgotten by the “globalist” elite that dominates the corridors of power. Second, they are opposed to the “administrative state” and the growth of non-legislative powers in the hands of bureaucrats and experts. Precisely for this reason, COVID-19 public health measures have been a boon for the right, whose supporters see an encroaching state in each new regulation. Thus, vaccine mandates are a symbol that unifies and mobilizes opposition to an unrepresentative and overbearing state. Third, recent right-wing movements attack what they see as condescension from mainstream media and cultural institutions that disparage the values and concerns of ordinary people.

These ideas may be flawed and misguided, but they cannot be dismissed as the product of a narrow fringe.

These ideas may be flawed and misguided, but they cannot be dismissed as the product of a narrow fringe. They are designed to mobilize a wider public that is not part of the protest but that nevertheless finds elements of the narrative persuasive. The success of radical right-wing parties in France in framing the gilets jaunes protests in these terms, and the narrative of the Jan. 6 insurrection at The U.S. Capitol championed by Trumpist elements of the Republican party, reflect this strategy. Given that, according to some polls, nearly half of Canadians have at least some sympathy with the protest, the important issue is not the activities of a radical fringe. It is the possibility that the protests give the politics of division wider appeal.

Canadian politics is at a crossroads. If the polarization of the political landscape seen in so many other parts of the world is to be avoided, political leaders need to face up to the challenges posed by the protestors. There are four possible responses leaders can take to the current protests, and similar ones that are likely to follow.

First, ignore them. The consequences of this strategy have been clearly displayed on the streets of Ottawa, and on the Ambassador Bridge. A second approach is to demonize them. Here, the Prime Minister’s dismissal of the demonstrators as a “fringe minority” holding ”unacceptable views” risks reinforcing charges of elite disdain. It echoes Hillary Clinton’s famous “basket of deplorables” comment, which continues to serve as a rallying point on the populist American right. Mark Carney’s charge that the protest amounts to “sedition” supported by foreign funds similarly risks being presented as just another attack on honest people by a card-carrying member of the globalist elite. Such stances risk contributing to the politics of division.

‍

‍

Source Link here

‍